We never recommend a heavier execution of steam pressure reducing valve than needed, because over specification only raises price and lead time. At large pressure ratios we use multistage or perforated trim to keep noise and erosion within acceptable limits. On steam applications we always ask for pressure and temperature upstream and downstream, because pressure drop defines the trim construction. For safety functions we record the required closing time and fail position explicitly in the order. The cleaning and flushing procedure counts too on steam pressure reducing valve, because it can be more aggressive than the process itself. If a simpler type will do the job, we say so on steam pressure reducing valve, even when that means a smaller order. The required leakage class often drives the choice around steam pressure reducing valve more strongly than the budget does. For steam pressure reducing valve total cost of ownership weighs more than purchase price, certainly when replacement has to happen during a shutdown. Insulation around a steam valve should leave the actuator clear, because overheating of the actuator is a common cause of failure. On commissioning we record set pressure, closing time and test results, so the plant can be shown to run within specification. For an accurate quotation we need the nominal diameter, the pressure class, the medium, the operating temperature and the required actuation. On steam pressure reducing valve we check that the actuator is sized on torque at maximum differential pressure and not on an average value.