Where there is doubt about continuous blowdown valve we quote two executions side by side, with the trade offs stated explicitly. On steam applications we always ask for pressure and temperature upstream and downstream, because pressure drop defines the trim construction. For safety functions we record the required closing time and fail position explicitly in the order. A steam test device makes it possible to test the operation of safety valves while the plant stays in service. If a simpler type will do the job, we say so on continuous blowdown valve, even when that means a smaller order. We never recommend a heavier execution of continuous blowdown valve than needed, because over specification only raises price and lead time. On continuous blowdown valve we check that the actuator is sized on torque at maximum differential pressure and not on an average value. The required leakage class often drives the choice around continuous blowdown valve more strongly than the budget does. PRUSS is strongly represented in this segment with valves for steam, boiler, turbine and gas turbine duty. On commissioning we record set pressure, closing time and test results, so the plant can be shown to run within specification. For an accurate quotation we need the nominal diameter, the pressure class, the medium, the operating temperature and the required actuation. On continuous blowdown valve we also state what an execution cannot do, because that prevents more problems than a list of advantages. For continuous blowdown valve we ask as standard for DN, pressure class, medium, temperature and required actuation.